Medical Students' Honesty in Summative Reflective Writing

This rapid review aims to explore medical students' views of reflection as an actively assessed part of the medical school curriculum and whether it affects the genuineness of their reflective assignments. Data was gathered by searching online databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Eric, Cochrane Library, Best Evidence Medical Education) and reviewed against the inclusion criteria. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for appraisal of qualitative studies was used to assess the included primary studies, while the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Text and Opinion Pieces was used to assess the opinion pieces.本快速综述旨在探究医学生对于反思作为医学院课程中主动评估环节的看法，以及该评估环节是否会影响其反思性作业的真实性。本研究通过检索在线数据库（Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus、ERIC、Cochrane Library、Best Evidence Medical Education）收集数据，并依据纳入标准对文献进行筛选。本研究采用批判性评价技能计划（Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, CASP）工具对纳入的原始研究进行质量评价，同时使用JBI文本与观点类文献批判性评价清单对相关观点性文献开展质量评估。