遇见数据集

VPRS 11022 Court of Petty Sessions Special Complaints Register

收藏
Research Data Australia2024-12-14 收录
官方服务:

资源简介:

The special jurisdiction of Courts of Petty Sessions was formally established by the Justices' Act 1928. From this time there were two mechanisms within Courts of Petty Sessions/Magistrates' Courts for the redress of civil complaints.The "ordinary jurisdiction empowered the court to determine cases for damages or debts where the precise amount of the claim could be determined according to some objective scale. An example would be the recovery of a debt for goods delivered. Claims brought to court in the ordinary civil jurisdiction often used the system of judgement by default. This system provided that where a respondent did not respond to a summons by giving notice of his or her intention to defend the claim, a judgement could be made in favour of the complainant without a formal court hearing.In its "special jurisdiction the court itself determined the appropriate amount of redress and operated within a higher jurisdictional limit. Claims for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident were typically handled in the special jurisdiction. In the special jurisdiction a stipendiary magistrate would preside rather than justices of the peace.The Magistrates' Courts (Civil Jurisdiction) Act 1979 abolished the distinction between ordinary and special complaints and established a single civil jurisdiction.A separate register was required to be kept for recording special complaints. Special Complaints Registers are generally in a common format, giving details of the case number, the name of the complainant, the name of the respondent, how the case came to the court (type and date of summons), a description of the cause or proceeding, the decision or order and any remarks. In order to authenticate entries made in the register the presiding stipendiary magistrate signed it at the end of each day.

小额诉讼法庭(Courts of Petty Sessions)的特别管辖权由《1928年治安法官法(Justices' Act 1928)》正式确立。自此,小额诉讼法庭/治安法院内设有两种为民事申诉提供救济的机制。 “普通管辖权”允许法庭在索赔金额可依据客观标准确定的情况下,裁决损害赔偿或债务纠纷案件,例如追讨已交付货物的欠款。适用普通民事管辖权的诉讼常采用缺席判决制度:若被告未提交答辩意向通知以回应传票,法庭可不经正式庭审直接作出有利于原告的判决。 其“特别管辖权”模式下,法庭可自行确定适当的救济金额,且受更高的管辖权限额约束。机动车交通事故引发的损害赔偿索赔通常由特别管辖权程序处理。在特别管辖权模式下,由领薪治安法官(stipendiary magistrate)主持庭审,而非太平绅士(justices of the peace)。 《1979年治安法院(民事管辖权)法(Magistrates' Courts (Civil Jurisdiction) Act 1979)》废除了普通申诉与特别申诉的区分,确立了统一的民事管辖权制度。 当时需单独设立登记册以记录特别申诉案件。特别申诉登记册通常采用统一格式,需载明案号、原告姓名、被告姓名、案件受理方式(传票类型与送达日期)、案由或诉讼程序详情、判决或裁定结果及备注信息。为验证登记条目真实性,主持庭审的领薪治安法官需于每日庭审结束后签字确认。

二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务