Abstract of associated article: We examine potential selective reporting (publication bias) in the literature on the social cost of carbon (SCC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 809 estimates of the S
Datasets w/ simulated error derived from Datasets 1-5. There are 1000 datasets per combination of error level and skewness type. e1: Low error, no skew e2: Medium error, no skew e3: High error, n
Associations between determinants and publication, expressed as crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the crude and adjusted ORs.
