首页/数据集/Comparison of model performance on the DFDC dataset.

Comparison of model performance on the DFDC dataset.

Figshare2024-10-10 更新2026-04-28 收录

深度伪造

性能评估

数据链接：

https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_model_performance_on_the_DFDC_dataset_/27206390 数据链接链接失效反馈

官方服务：

资源简介：

Comparison of model performance on the DFDC dataset.

应用场景：

创建时间：

2024-10-10

相关数据集

RLHF-And-Friends/SFT-vs-Shapa-CoPPO-4x

强化学习文本摘要

性能评估

该数据集包含两个模型对给定提示的响应。prompt列包含提供给两个模型的提示，另外两列分别包含相应模型的响应。使用的模型为：左侧是TLDR-Mistral-7B-SFT，右侧是ppo-4x-mistral-7b-smallsft-tldr。原始数据集为RLHF-And-Friends/tldr-ppo。根据gpt-4o-mini的观点，ppo-4x-mistral-7b-smallsft-tldr

Hugging Face2025-03-21 更新80

Comparing performance of different subspace estimation methods, for Weak-Contrast data.

子空间估计

性能评估

For weak contrast (TaskB vs. TaskA), model performance is shown for different subspace estimation methods, relative to full-dimensionality data (i.e. retaining all PCs). The median, [minimum, maximum]

NIAID Data Ecosystem40

Supervised arm performance: ST+HIVSmart! vs. lab-confirmed HIV status.

HIV检测技术

性能评估

Supervised arm performance: ST+HIVSmart! vs. lab-confirmed HIV status.

Figshare2025-04-08 更新20

Appendix B. Frequency of Type I and Type II errors in 12 different benchmark tests for the two proposed methods (EcoTest, BiogTest).

统计检验

性能评估

Frequency of Type I and Type II errors in 12 different benchmark tests for the two proposed methods (EcoTest, BiogTest).

Figshare2016-08-10 更新50

Diagnostic abilities of T staging of the bladder cancer.