Erdem Onan - PhD Projectdata for study 5

<B>Title</B><BR><BR> Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Auscultation through Interleaved Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Field Study<BR><BR> <B>Summary</B><BR><BR> This research investigated the effectiveness of blocked and interleaved practice in diagnosing abnormal respiratory sounds. Conducted as a quasi-experimental study, it involved nursing students from two classrooms at Akdeniz University. The study took place in a whole classroom environment as part of their on-going education. Key dependent variables were students’ diagnostic accuracy, monitoring accuracy, and learning strategy beliefs.<BR><BR> <B>Data Description</B><BR><BR> 1. Category learning judgments: <BR> • NB (Normal Bronc.), NV (Normal Ves.), CF (Crackle Fine), CC (Crackle Course), WH (Wheezing), RH (Rhonchi) # Individual judgments 0-100.<BR> • JOL: Average of monitoring judgments.<BR><BR> 2. Diagnostic Accuracy<BR> • Q1-12 raw answers.<BR> • CF1  CC2; accuracy scores at the sound level. #Immediate test.<BR> • Test_IM: Aggregated test score for the immediate test.<BR> • NV3  WH4: accuracy scores at the sound level. # delayed test.<BR> • Test_D: Aggregated test score at the delayed test.<BR> • Effort: Anticipated effort associated with blocking and interleaving<BR> - B for blocking, I for interleaving.<BR> • Belief: Strategy beliefsv - 1: Blocking, 0 Equal, 2 Interleaving. <BR><BR>