2,3-二氯吡啶全球高价值专利数据

数据包中主要包括了全球专利数据库中有关2,3-二氯吡啶的发明专利和实用新型专利数据，并根据自有算法对专利数据进行了评价和分类，可用于横向、纵向了解2,3-二氯吡啶专利数据变化情况，有助于了解2,3-二氯吡啶知识产权工作成果；通过对各企业/个人2,3-二氯吡啶专利数据的对比，可了解各企业/个人的技术创新能力、创新水平差异；了解2,3-二氯吡啶的技术发展趋势，有助于企业避免重复研发，避免企业开发的技术侵犯他人的知识产权。本数据基于熵权法的 AHP 模型，目标层为专利价值，指标层将专利价值指标体系分为市场、技术、法律、战略、经济五大价值维度，指标层向下分准则层，包括：技术价值：IPC分类数量、被引用专利数量、授权年限；经济价值：剩余年数、综合第三方估值、质押次数；法律价值：权利要求数、文献页数、非专利引用文献数量；战略价值：发明人数量、简单同族成员数量、5年内被引次数；市场价值：技术主题分类数、专利类型、是否战略新兴产业。根据维度和指标建立五个维度的原始矩阵和专利评价准则求得相应权重。由熵权法求得的权重用于各个价值的计算，五个维度单项价值均等，五类价值之和定义为高价值专利综合价值，利用IFS函数对专利进行价值判定，用于区分超高价值专利、高价值专利、一般价值专利和无价值专利，为本领域技术人员提供研发决策依据和技术规避作优先参考。

The dataset mainly includes invention patents and utility model patents related to 2,3-dichloropyridine from the global patent database. It also evaluates and classifies the patent data using a proprietary algorithm, enabling users to conduct cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of the changes in 2,3-dichloropyridine-related patent data, and facilitating the assessment of intellectual property work outcomes related to 2,3-dichloropyridine. By comparing the 2,3-dichloropyridine-related patent data of different enterprises and individual inventors, users can gain insights into the technological innovation capabilities and disparities in innovation levels among these entities. Understanding the technological development trends of 2,3-dichloropyridine can help enterprises avoid redundant research and development (R&D) and prevent their developed technologies from infringing on others' intellectual property rights.

This dataset is built upon the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model integrated with the Entropy Weight Method (EWM). The target layer of the model is patent value, and the index layer divides the patent value indicator system into five value dimensions: market, technology, law, strategy, and economy. The index layer is further subdivided into the criterion layer, which includes:
- Technological value: number of IPC classifications, number of cited patents, years since patent grant;
- Economic value: remaining patent term, comprehensive third-party valuation, number of patent pledges;
- Legal value: number of claims, number of document pages, number of non-patent literature citations;
- Strategic value: number of inventors, number of simple patent family members, number of citations within 5 years;
- Market value: number of technical theme classifications, patent type, and whether the patent belongs to strategic emerging industries.

Corresponding weights are derived by constructing a five-dimensional original matrix and patent evaluation criteria based on the aforementioned dimensions and indicators. The weights calculated via the EWM are utilized to compute the value of each dimension. The five single-dimensional values are equally weighted, and the sum of the five dimensions is defined as the comprehensive value of high-value patents. The IFS function is employed to assess the value of patents, categorizing them into ultra-high-value, high-value, medium-value, and low-value/non-value patents, providing a priority reference for R&D decision-making and technology avoidance for technicians in this field.