Data from: Consensus and confusion in Molluscan trees: evaluating morphological and molecular phylogenies

Supplementary Table 1Tree file containing all trees used in analyses.SL_SuppTable_s1_treefile.nexSupplementary Figure 1Percentage of trees wherein a given taxon pair are separated by two nodes or fewer (e.g. sister-taxa are separated by 1 node). Zero-values indicate that a given pair are always more than 2 nodes apart, in our dataset of 42 trees including morphological (blue, n=27) and molecular (green, n=15) datasets.suppl-figure1_nodedistances.epsSupplementary Figure 2Multidimensional scaling plot of 5000 randomly-generated trees including 8 molluscan classes, and our dataset of 42 trees from the literature (morphological, blue circles; molecular, red circles). Trees plotted outside of the randomly generated trees represent source trees with fewer than 8 classes in their topology.suppl-figure2_TreViz_SourceTrees.epsSupplementary Tables 2-4TABLE S2. Tree notation, scores, permutation tail probability tests, source tree fit, and related data for each of the molecular supertrees analyses. TABLE S3. Tree notation, scores, permutation tail probability tests, source tree fit, and related data for each of the morphological supertrees analyses. TABLE S4. Symmetric distances between supertrees. Partition: Morph = morphology, Molec = molecular.SL_SuppTables_S2-S4.docx