Additional Example Questions, Responses, and Evaluations of the PPP RAG Tool

This dataset provides four additional examples of users using the EU Peatland Policy Portal's RAG tool in its development phase and their corresponding feedback, with English translations provided alongside questions asked in a different language.

This data was collected anonymously as project partners from various disciplines (research, policy, practical restoration) interacted with the RAG tool. The feedback in Question 3 came from one user, Question 4 and Question 5 from a second user, and Question 6 from a third user. The response given in Table Question 3 was evaluated as accurate but not specific enough to be useful. The main critiques of the response in Question 4 were the translation of specific term and the addition of irrelevant documents on top of an otherwise acceptable answer. While brief, the evaluation of Question 5's response is promisingly positive. Finally, the evaluation of the response in Question 6 is mostly negative, but still open to the tool conceptually if the implementation can become more refined.