Acoustic data|声学研究数据集|环境声学监测数据集

Sound particle motion and pressure recordings for Ferrari et al 2018 School is out paper. Methods: Acoustic recordings: Sound pressure was recorded with an omnidirectional hydrophone (HiTech HTI-96-MIN with inbuilt preamplifier; sensitivity -165 dB re 1V/μPa; frequency range 2 Hz–30 kHz; High Tech Inc., Gulfport MS) and a solid-state recorder (Zoom H2 recorder; sampling rate 44.1 kHz; Zoom Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The recorder was fully calibrated using pure sine wave signals generated in SAS Lab (Avisoft, Germany), played on an mp3 player, measured in line with an oscilloscope. Particle acceleration was recorded with an accelerometer (M30, sensitivity 0–3 kHz, manufactured and calibrated by GeoSpectrum Technologies, Dartmouth, Canada; recorded on a laptop via a USB soundcard, MAYA44, ESI Audiotechnik GmbH, Leonberg, Germany). Acoustic analysis: Acoustic recordings were analysed in MATLAB v2013a. Fast-Fourier Transforms were used to transform time domain recordings into the frequency domain before power spectral density was calculated with a window length of 1024 using a Hamming window on 1-min samples of ambient and boat sounds in the tank compared with original recordings made in the lagoon. This allowed comparison of sound levels across the frequency range 0-3 kHz. Sound levels are only considered up to 3 kHz due to the upper limit of the sensitivity of the accelerometer. This frequency range is likely to cover the hearing range of most fish. Figure Legend: Figure x. Sound pressure (left) and particle acceleration (right) power spectral densities of ambient and boat sounds in the tank compared with original recordings made in the lagoon. Sampling rate of recordings = 44.1 kHz, window length = 1024. Each line on the figure represents the mean level from 60 x 1-s Hamming filtered windows for the frequency range 0-3 kHz.